Here’s another laugh from a site I’m reviewing now. This is what happens when you outsource the text from within your member’s area….
“Hi there dear member! Thank you have joined our site. We promise you willn’t regret that became our customer. Remember that we highly appreciate your attitude to our project and we try to hold high quality of site.”
It goes on and on but I willn’t get into it at the moment.
I was just finishing up a review for All Sites Access and I was doing my regular round of spell/grammar check when I came across this gem:
This be another busy day for me :)
This is probably the coolest optical illusion I’ve ever seen. I stared at it until I got a headache :)
There are a couple things on the agenda today. First, let’s get this contest out of the way (yes, you guys are losers, only two of you submitted anything). Anyway, I promised a grand prize of either $10 or a porno mailed to your house.
Drumroll please…
And the winner is… Ken! Here’s his submission. Although he was too afraid to show me his true self, he did try his best and came up with this. It was in honor of my unveiling (his phrase, not mine):
Second and only other place goes to Steve who opted to not have his photo shown – despite how sexy it was. And now for part two of the contest, I promised to finally show a picture of myself. I’m not willing to have my picture taken often so it was hard to find one…
I’m going to Maryland tomorrow and I may come back with some sexy stalker photos of naked sluts, but no guarantees. Oh, and here’s me with my vibrator!
I’ve had many debates about the moon landing with people and up until now there hasn’t been any conclusive evidence to swing me either way. From these new photos and expert analysis, I can definitely say that the moon landing is FAKE.
(Source: http://www.stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm)
Heroic images or NASA fraud? At last we have the conclusive proof! The image on the top clearly shows the supposed 25,000 of thrust generated by the lunar lander to arrest its descent. Yet in the image on the bottom, where is the giant crater this would have created?
Looks like the complex web of NASA lies is about to unravel!
Another apparently inspirational image from the NASA archive. All seems fine at first but notice the numerous directions in which the shadows are falling (marked with arrows).
This indicates that the image is probably composed of several images taken at different times (probably in a top secret studio guarded by specially trained aliens working as government agents) and joined together using advanced technology NASA always denies existed at the time.
This is the photographic equivalent of an automotive “cut-and-shut” job.
If this image was your car, you wouldn’t trust it take you to the end of your road without breaking in half!
Not much wrong with this picture you may think. Yet, by thinking that, you would just become yet another of NASA’s conspiracy victims.
Firstly, despite the absence of an atmosphere, no stars can be seen in the sky.
Secondly, the interior of the shopping basket can clearly be seen when all areas in shadow should be pitch black due to the absence of air molecules.
Nice try NASA but we are not fooled that easily!
Just way too many things wrong with this picture!
Notice the absence of stars again.
The arrows indicate the various directions in which shadows are falling, again showing evidence of inconsistent scene illumination. Yet there is something even more obviously wrong with this picture.
If the length of the lower support column of the lunar lander was 4 feet tall, this would indicate that the astronaut was over 8 feet tall, which none of the astronauts were.
Another careless mistake from NASA.
Oh yes NASA, it’s all very well adding stars on this picture just to make us realize how wrong we have been. We are not fooled so easily!
If we look a bit more closely, we spot the constellation of Pegasus with the planet Saturn (marked S1) clearly visible in the top left corner. Yet at the time of the mission, although Saturn appeared to be near Pegasus from Earth, from the Moon it would have appeared to be in a completely different position (marked S2).
It is almost insulting to think that NASA could get away with this obvious howler!
Well, with this image where does one begin?!
Inconsistent shadows, too much ambient light and incorrect planetary positioning in the sky are all evident here.
Also notice how the focal length of the camera lens has changed compared to the pictures above, even though the astronauts’ Hasselblad cameras were only fitted with a single type of prime lens.
Does Nasa really think we are idiots? This pic is an obvious fake, notice the artificial land forms and the absence of stars.
Finally the official Nasa picture of the moon shows some unusual features. Note that the Sea of Tranquility is beside the Cambrian mountains and the absence of stars in the background. A very clever attempt from Nasa to fool the public.
Indesputable evidence that the moon landing was a fake. This comprehensive video diary proves that there was no way for the moon landing to have occurred.